Esta página está disponível só em inglês. A versão em português depende de revisão de um advogado, não de tradução.

Analysis

F1 Wet Race 2026: Rain Hit Three Rounds, Grid Held

Rain reached three of 19 rounds this year, and the driver on the front of the grid won every time.

GridRaces Desk4 min read
Open-wheel race car throwing spray on a wet circuit under dark storm clouds
AI-generated illustration, GridRaces

Key takeaways

An F1 wet race in 2026 has not scrambled the order the way the folklore says it should. Rain registered in three of the 19 rounds in the GridRaces data (Miami, the Netherlands and the Malaysia round), and all three were won by the driver who started first on the grid. With showers a live possibility at Interlagos for the 2026 Sao Paulo Grand Prix on 8 November 2026, that is a number worth holding up against the forecast.

Does an F1 wet race in 2026 shuffle the grid?

Not by much. We measured how far drivers moved between their starting slot and their finishing position, averaged across every driver who finished. In the three races with rain on the sensor, that figure was 2.93 places. In the other 16 rounds it was 2.89. That is a difference you could lose between two pit stops.

Retirements tell the same story. The three rain-affected races produced 12 DNFs, an average of 4.0 per race. The 16 dry ones produced 63, or 3.9. If water is supposed to be the great equaliser, 2026 has not been paying out.

The winners are the cleanest evidence. In Miami (Round 4), Kimi Antonelli won from first on the grid, with Lando Norris second from fourth. At the Dutch Grand Prix (Round 12), Norris won from first, with Antonelli second from third. In the Malaysia round (Round 16), Max Verstappen won from first, with Antonelli second from third. Three wet races, three wins from the front, and Antonelli on the podium in each.

The big movers were at the other end of the grid. Arvid Lindblad climbed from 22nd to 10th in the Malaysia round, the biggest gain of the three, and Fernando Alonso went from 18th to ninth in the Netherlands. Gabriel Bortoleto made up nine places in Miami, from 21st to 12th. Those are recovery drives from deep slots, the kind that happen in dry races too, not a front-runner being swapped out for a surprise winner. The notable losses were Leclerc, who slipped from third to eighth in Miami, and Russell, who started seventh in Malaysia and is listed 20th after his retirement.

How wet were those races, really?

This is the honest caveat, and it matters. The rainfall flag in the session weather feed was raised on 3 of 168 samples in Miami, 32 of 191 in the Netherlands and 80 of 254 in the Malaysia round. Miami was a few drops, not a deluge. Malaysia was the real test, and that is the one with the largest shuffle, 4.00 places, though the sample is one race and Russell's retirement there (a power unit failure, per Crash.net) feeds straight into it.

So the right reading is not that rain does nothing. It is that the rain we have actually seen this year was either brief or arrived in a season where the car at the front also wanted to win in the wet. We do not have a single heavy, race-long downpour in the 2026 data, and Interlagos is one of the few places that could supply it.

What does the Interlagos forecast say?

Forecasts disagree, so we are not printing a percentage. Formula1.com and PlanetF1, both writing on 4 November 2026, put a meaningful chance of rain on race day, with Formula1.com flagging possible heavy rain and thunderstorms and cooler air than Saturday. PlanetF1 notes the forecast could change. Both were published days ahead, so check the live picture before you trust either.

Counter-argument: three races prove nothing

Correct, and we would say so ourselves. Three races is a small sample, the dry baseline includes several chaotic days (round 15 alone had seven DNFs), and a wet race at a track known for sudden showers is a different animal from a drizzle in Miami.

There is also a definitional problem. We count a race as wet when the sensor feed flags rainfall at any point, which treats a passing shower and a soaked afternoon as the same thing. A cleaner test needs more races, and we will rerun this if Interlagos supplies one.

But the pattern does challenge one lazy assumption: that the grid is worth less in the rain. In 2026, so far, it has been worth exactly as much. Our pole-to-win analysis found the driver first on the grid wins 13 of 19. Strip out the three wet races and that is still 10 of 16, so the rain-free record is not flattering the wet one.

What to take into Sunday

If the heavens open, expect strategy calls and tyre timing to matter more than raw pace, but do not assume the order will turn upside down. Watch the live page for the grid after qualifying, use Telemetry to compare each driver's pace, and check the standings for what is on the line. Our Russell grid penalty news covers the one driver who will be starting five places lower than he qualifies, in whatever conditions arrive.

Wet vs dry, 2026 rounds 1-19
Rain-flagged races won from grid one
3 of 3
Avg places moved, wet / dry
2.93 / 2.89
DNFs per race, wet / dry
4.0 / 3.9
Rounds with rain flagged
3 of 19
Source: GridRaces telemetry & timing dataExplore telemetry

Frequently asked questions

Does rain shuffle the F1 grid in 2026?

Not in the GridRaces data so far. Drivers moved 2.93 places on average in the three rain-affected races versus 2.89 in the dry ones.

Who won the wet races in 2026?

Kimi Antonelli in Miami, Lando Norris in the Netherlands and Max Verstappen in the Malaysia round, all starting first on the grid.

Sources

  1. What is the weather forecast for the 2026 Sao Paulo Grand Prix? — Formula1.com
  2. F1 Brazil weather: What is the risk of rain at Interlagos this weekend? — PlanetF1
  3. George Russell to take F1 grid penalty at Brazil GP — Crash.net
#analysis#rain#wet race#interlagos#data#2026
ShareXLinkedInWhatsAppReddit