Esta página está disponível só em inglês. A versão em português depende de revisão de um advogado, não de tradução.
AnalysisMercedes Qualifying Pace 2026: 0.074s From Pole on Average
Six rounds of GridRaces qualifying data say Mercedes owns the closest single lap in the field. Then Malaysia happened, and Singapore has to explain it.

Key takeaways
- Across Rounds 10 to 15, Mercedes' quicker car averaged 0.074s off pole, the smallest gap of any team in GridRaces data.
- McLaren averaged 0.243s, Ferrari 0.353s and Red Bull 0.448s over the same six rounds.
- Mercedes' second car averaged 0.365s off pole in the five rounds both cars set a Q3 time.
- Mercedes drivers won four of the six races between the Belgian and Azerbaijan Grands Prix.
- Mercedes is running old and new aero specs in Singapore after the upgrade fell short of its expected 0.3s gain in Malaysia.
Mercedes qualifying pace 2026 has been the best in the field across the last six scored rounds. The team's quicker car sat an average of 0.074s off pole in Rounds 10 to 15, from the Belgian Grand Prix to the Azerbaijan Grand Prix, according to GridRaces data. McLaren averaged 0.243s, Ferrari 0.353s and Red Bull 0.448s. Then Mercedes took a new aero package to Malaysia and, by Toto Wolff's account, it went backwards. Saturday was not the problem. Singapore is where we find out what is.
How did we measure Mercedes qualifying pace?
For each of Rounds 10 to 15 (Belgian, Hungarian, Dutch, Italian, Spanish and Azerbaijan Grands Prix) we took every team's quickest Q3 time and subtracted the pole time. Only the four teams that reached Q3 in all six rounds are compared. Round 16 in Malaysia is not in the GridRaces qualifying table yet, so nothing about Sepang below comes from our data. It comes from the outlets listed at the end.
Mercedes qualifying pace 2026: six rounds, one pattern
Here is the quicker Mercedes in each round, measured against pole.
| Round | Grand Prix | Quicker Mercedes | Gap to pole |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Belgian | Kimi Antonelli | 0.000s (pole) |
| 11 | Hungarian | Kimi Antonelli | +0.272s |
| 12 | Dutch | George Russell | +0.102s |
| 13 | Italian | George Russell | +0.060s |
| 14 | Spanish | Kimi Antonelli | +0.011s |
| 15 | Azerbaijan | George Russell | 0.000s (pole) |
Two poles, three more rounds within 0.102s, and a worst case of 0.272s. In the Spanish Grand Prix the gap was 0.011s, the sort of margin that gets decided by which driver's tyres were warmer, not which car was better. Nobody else in the field matched that consistency. McLaren took three poles in the same stretch but averaged 0.243s off because its worst round was 0.838s away.
What is the catch in the Mercedes qualifying data?
One car at a time. In the five rounds where both Mercedes set a Q3 time, the slower of the two averaged 0.365s off pole (0.508s, 0.553s, 0.133s, 0.307s and 0.325s). That is about five times the gap of the quicker car. In Azerbaijan, Antonelli did not set a Q3 time at all and started 16th, while Russell took pole. A team average built on the best car flatters a team whose two cars are not equally comfortable.
It did not stop the results. Mercedes drivers won four of the six races: Antonelli in Belgium, Italy and Spain, Russell in Azerbaijan. Russell retired in Belgium from third on the grid, which is the footnote in an otherwise tidy ledger.
What changed at Sepang?
The Race and Crash.net both reported on 7 October 2026 that Mercedes brought a new aero package to the previous round in Malaysia and expected about 0.3s from it. The gain did not show. The Race says Wolff believed the package lost up to half a second, and that the team has also asked whether Sepang's rough surface played a part. Crash.net quotes Wolff calling the qualifying shortfall "very difficult to understand". The same race, according to The Race, gave Max Verstappen his first pole and win of the season. Red Bull's six-round average of 0.448s did not predict that, which is a good reminder that averages describe the past and tracks keep their own opinions.
What did Singapore FP1 tell us?
Mercedes is running the two packages side by side this weekend. In the only practice session on Friday, 9 October 2026, Russell was fastest in 1m32.274s, and The Race reports that he was in the older-spec car. Antonelli, in the upgrade, was seventh, 1.251s back, after running wide on his last push lap. On hard tyres the pair were only 0.056s apart, with Antonelli ahead. One session, one mistake and different run plans: that is not enough to rule on a part. It is enough to say the new spec is not obviously broken at Marina Bay.
What is the counter-argument?
Several. Six rounds is a small sample, and a best-car average rewards a team that is lucky enough to have one driver in a groove. Qualifying gaps are also not race pace, and Singapore's street layout bears little resemblance to Spa or Monza. The Sepang surface may account for part of the shortfall, in which case the upgrade is innocent and the data above still stands. And the numbers come with a reminder: this table was built before Malaysia, and Malaysia is the only recent data point that contradicts it.
Verdict: is the Mercedes qualifying pace real?
Our read is that the speed is real and the diagnosis is open. Across six rounds the car has been the closest to pole of any team, with the second car as the weak spot. Malaysia is one result against that pattern, and the package may or may not be the cause. Our guess, and it is only a guess: the best Mercedes in sprint qualifying lands on the front two rows. Russell starts the race from the back of the grid after an engine penalty, per Crash.net, so Antonelli is the driver who carries the new spec and the weekend's loudest question.
Line the Mercedes drivers up against the field yourself on /telemetry, then make your Singapore picks on /predict before sprint qualifying starts today.
| Pos | Driver | Gap to pole |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mercedes | +0.074s |
| 2 | McLaren | +0.243s |
| 3 | Ferrari | +0.353s |
| 4 | Red Bull | +0.448s |
- Poles
- 2
- Quicker car, avg gap to pole
- 0.074s
- Slower car, avg gap (5 rounds)
- 0.365s
- Races won
- 4 of 6
Frequently asked questions
How close has Mercedes been to pole in 2026?
Across Rounds 10 to 15 the quicker Mercedes averaged 0.074s off pole in GridRaces data, with two poles and a worst gap of 0.272s.
Why is Mercedes running two car specs in Singapore?
The Race and Crash.net report that Mercedes wants a back-to-back comparison of its new and previous aero packages after the upgrade did not deliver its expected gain in Malaysia.
Is Mercedes still ahead of McLaren in qualifying?
Over Rounds 10 to 15, yes on average: 0.074s off pole versus 0.243s for McLaren, although McLaren took three poles to Mercedes' two.
Sources
Related

Singapore GP FP1 Results: Russell Tops Old-Spec Mercedes
Russell topped the sole Singapore practice in the older-spec Mercedes, 0.198s clear of Leclerc, while Antonelli ran the upgrade.

F1 Driver Form 2026: Verstappen Out-Scored Everyone
Verstappen scored 101 points in rounds 13 to 17, Antonelli 93. GridRaces data on who is peaking before Mexico City.

Antonelli vs Russell 2026: Singapore Tests the Mercedes Gap
Antonelli vs Russell through 15 rounds: eight wins to three, no DNFs to two, level on poles. What the Singapore GP back-row start means for Mercedes.